Community Alliance Newspaper
Letters to the Editor
July 2009 Letters:
As
the Obama administration pushes for a vote on health care reform before Congress
recesses in August, has health industry money too thoroughly polluted the
process for anything good to come of it?
Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairs the Senate Finance Committee, key to any health
care reform. Baucus has held several high-profile Senate committee hearings on
health care, with no single-payer advocates. They were present, though, until
Baucus had them arrested-for standing up one by one in the audience, protesting
the exclusion of a single-payer representative on the panel. Baucus is only
parroting President Barack Obama's pledge that "single-payer is off the table."
Yet single-payer health care has significant support among the U.S. public, and
increasingly among health care providers. With single-payer, the government pays
the bills, but people still choose what doctors to see. Private health insurance
companies and HMOs-the profiteers-go out of business.
Mike Dennison, a reporter for The Montana Standard, found that Baucus has
received more campaign money from health and insurance industry interests than
any other member of Congress. Dennison told me, "We're talking about the health
insurance industry and ... HMOs, hospitals, physicians, pharmaceutical
companies-that's probably where the bulk of his money has come from ... out of
about almost $15 million he's raised in the last six years, both for his
campaign and his leadership PAC, 23 percent of that came from insurance and
health interests ... which we believe is probably more than any other member has
received."
At a public forum in New Mexico, Linda Allison asked Obama about Baucus'
finances: "[S]o many people go bankrupt using their credit cards to pay for
health care. Why have they taken single-payer off the plate? And why is Baucus
on the Finance Committee discussing health care when he has received so much
money from the pharmaceutical companies? Isn't it a conflict of interest?"
Obama dodged the issue of Baucus, but did admit: "If I were starting a system
from scratch, then I think that the idea of moving towards a single-payer system
could very well make sense. That's the kind of system that you have in most
industrialized countries around the world."
Allison's concern about bankruptcy is timely. According to a recent Harvard
Medical School study, "62.1 percent of all bankruptcies in 2007 were medical."
Many of these people are not from the 50 million or so uninsured Americans, but
from among the estimated 25 million who are underinsured. That a person can have
health insurance and still be driven to bankruptcy over hospital bills and
pharmaceutical costs is a national disgrace.
Just days before Obama addressed the American Medical Association this week, the
AMA announced that it would oppose a public health option.
In response, at least one doctor canceled his membership. In his resignation
letter, Dr. Chris McCoy of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., wrote that the
AMA "couldn't get through the second paragraph before bringing up the issue of
physician reimbursement ... the AMA represents a physician-centered and
self-interested perspective rather than honoring the altruistic nature of my
profession. ... I advocate first for what is best for my patients and believe
that as a physician, as long as I continue to maintain the trust and integrity
of the profession, I will earn the respect of my community. The appropriate
financial compensation for my endeavors will follow in kind."
Recent congressional financial disclosures show that many key members have major
investments in the health care industry. The Washington Post reported this week
that almost 30 members of Congress who hold key committee memberships that will
impact the health care debate also have significant investments in health care
companies. The bipartisan group of investors includes Senate Majority Leader
Harry Reid, D-Nev.; Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H.; the family of Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif.;
Sen.ÿ Johnny Isakson, R-Ga.; Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass.; Sen. Michael Crapo,
R-Idaho-in all, amounting to between $11 million and $27 million (the number is
imprecise, since the disclosure forms allow some ambiguity).
According to the Associated Press, Jackie Clegg Dodd, wife of Sen. Chris Dodd,
D-Conn., serves on the boards of four health-related companies and earned more
than $200,000 last year. Sen. Dodd is sitting in as chair of the Senate Health,
Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, in place of Sen. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass.
Congress will soon break for its "summer recess," with members going back to
their home districts to raise money, of course, and, perhaps, to visit their
hometown health care provider-paid for by their publicly funded congressional
health care plan.
###
Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.
Amy Goodman is the host of "Democracy Now!," a daily international TV/radio news
hour heard on KFCF 88.1 FM at 6 and 9 a.m. every morning (Monday - Friday).
Democracy Now! can be seen on TV ch 49 (Comcast Cable ch 9) every evening (M-F)
at 6 p.m. She is the co-author of "Standing Up to the Madness: Ordinary Heroes
in Extraordinary Times," recently released in paperback.
Came across a copy of the latest edition of your newspaper and
really enjoyed it. I'm presently an inmate at Avenal State Prison and would like
to get on your mailing list. On the inside cover I noticed the information and
price in order to subscribe. Which subscription rate pertains to incarcerated
individuals? I'm a Three Strike victim and am serving a 25 year prison term on
an offense that carried the maximum penalty of 6 years (presently going on my
15th year on a non-violent offense). I was raised here in the Central Valley
(Merced) and in all my years I have never come across a newspaper of this kind.
In closing I would appreciate the information necessary to get on your mailing
list. Thank you for your time and what you're doing is greatly appreciated.
-Jeffrey Young, Avenal
[Editor's reply: The Community Alliance newspaper provides a free subscription
to any inmate that requests one. I have added Jeffrey to our mailing list.]
I noted that our mayor donated a large sum of money to the Rescue Mission to
help the homeless. From various articles in the Community Alliance it is clear
that the Rescue Mission has an unhealthy attitude of how to help the people that
need to leave their belongings in front of the building in order to get help
inside. When this nice gesture on the part of us, Fresnans, was televised, it
showed the billboard, "Jesus Saves-Rescue Mission."
Why is it that the city of Fresno, itself, cannot come up with a reasonable way
of helping homeless people but instead only makes use of (or hides behind)
religious institutions?-as, for example, Craycroft Village and the Salvation
Army. Many institutions do great work. However, I believe that the powers that
be in Fresno represent all of the people, belonging to a religion or not. How
about a central, community based, organization: For the People and By the
People?
Those who read this and get their shackles up: No! This is not about religion,
this is about proper representation and use of everyone's tax dollars.
-Elly Orrin
It would seem that in its decision to decline intervention in the "Don't Ask,
Don't Tell" policy involving Gays in the military, the U.S. Supreme Court
establishes that the Bible, not the Constitution, is the supreme authority in
the governing of our country.
-Woody Laughnan, Fresno